Re: radosgw: bad content length

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



 >
> > Telling from the source code the issue seems not to be that the 
content
> > lengths do not match, rather that the http-header Content-Length is 
not
> > parseable (allthough the header is displayed fine in the debug 
output). If
> > strict_strtol returns an error, to be exact - ?
> >
> 
> In that case the time is meaningless. How big is Content-Length when 
it fails?

CONTENT_LENGTH=2147483648
just a bit too much for a long - ?

Best regards
Axel Dunkel

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux