On Thu, 5 Jun 2014, Yehuda Sadeh wrote: > On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 10:42 AM, Samuel Just <sam.just@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I am starting to wonder whether using leveldb for the mon is actually > > introducing an excessive amount unnecessary complexity and > > non-determinism. Given that the monitor workload is read mostly, > > except for failure conditions when it becomes write latency sensitive, > > might we do better with a strict b-tree style backing db such as > > berkely db even at the cost of some performance? It seems like > > something like that might provide more reliable latency properties. > > > > Thoughts? > > Whichever route we're taking it'd be nice if it would have been > abstracted more cleanly, and make it pluggable. The first several patches in the wip-rocksdb branch do this. sage -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
