I am starting to wonder whether using leveldb for the mon is actually introducing an excessive amount unnecessary complexity and non-determinism. Given that the monitor workload is read mostly, except for failure conditions when it becomes write latency sensitive, might we do better with a strict b-tree style backing db such as berkely db even at the cost of some performance? It seems like something like that might provide more reliable latency properties. Thoughts? -Sam -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
