On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 10:42 AM, Samuel Just <sam.just@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I am starting to wonder whether using leveldb for the mon is actually > introducing an excessive amount unnecessary complexity and > non-determinism. Given that the monitor workload is read mostly, > except for failure conditions when it becomes write latency sensitive, > might we do better with a strict b-tree style backing db such as > berkely db even at the cost of some performance? It seems like > something like that might provide more reliable latency properties. > > Thoughts? Whichever route we're taking it'd be nice if it would have been abstracted more cleanly, and make it pluggable. Yehuda -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
