On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Sage Weil <sage@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, 25 Feb 2011, Colin Patrick McCabe wrote: >> Another idea: pool_t -> pool_context_t, PoolHandle -> PoolContext > > I prefer rados_ioctx_t or rados_handle_t.. putting pool in the name is > what is confusing (for me). Which pool you're using is just one (of > potentially many) pieces of context/state associated with the handle. > Yeah. I'd also rename the rados_pool_open()/close() to something else, e.g., rados_open() and rados_close() or rados_x_open() and rados_x_close() where x is not pool. Yehuda -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
