I kind of want to prefix all the object operations with "obj_" just to make things clear. Then it would be rados_obj_rollback() / PoolHandle::obj_rollback(). What do you think? Colin On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 9:05 AM, Sage Weil <sage@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, 25 Feb 2011, Gregory Farnum wrote: >> I think you guys talked about this yesterday -- sorry I missed it -- but >> what's the logic behind this new name "rados_rollback"? It's not quite >> working for me -- I think because it lacks the noun. :) Could we at >> least do rados_object_rollback()? Or even >> rados_object_rollback_to_snap()? > > It matches rados_write, read, remove, etc. Either they all get > rados_object_ prefix or none do. I'm fine with either... > > sage > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
