Les Mikesell wrote:
John Summerfield wrote:
Is there some reason to use Centos 2.x instead of 3.x? I don't see
any showstopper issues between everything I have running on 7.3
and Centos 3, although I'd probably install from scratch and
back in my old configs instead of expecting an upgrade to work.
Centos 2.1 is basically RHL 7.2,
That sounds like a good reason to not use it... A lot of things
didn't actually work right until 7.3 or some subsequent update
mod_perl for example). But maybe the fixes were also backed into
the enterprise 2.x updates.
One might reasonably expect that all such problems got fixed in the
commercial offering;-) How else would it be worth paying truckloads of
dollars for it?
--
Cheers
John
-- spambait
1aaaaaaa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Z1aaaaaaa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Please do not reply off-list
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
