On Tue, 2006-12-26 at 10:25 +0100, Sébastien AVELINE wrote: <SNIP> > > And, to follow up my own post, I've just had a quick look through my > > LVS list mails and spotted: > > > > http://archive.linuxvirtualserver.org/html/lvs-users/2006-11/msg00200.html > > > > > > There's no follow up from the OP which may or may not be a good thing. :) > > > > It appears a kernel upgrade to 2.6.18 (!) may help. You might want to > > fire off a mail to the OP and ask if he had any success. I have the > > un-obfuscated address in my mailstore, I'll send it offlist. > > > > Will. > Thanks for your help, but I will wait for an official patch from centos, > I hope that I will be heard. > > Sebastien Please follow the above thread and let me know if / when they find the problem. We will not be upgrading "officially" the ipvs RPM above the one that is in the RHCS / RHGFS RPMS ... but we can put something in the testing repo if ipvs turns out to be the issue. We can also feedback via the RHEL bugzilla to get any patches incorporated (as required) to the ipvs RPM upstream. Thanks, Johnny Hughes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
