Il 2021-07-09 13:57 Nikolaos Milas ha scritto:
On 9/7/2021 1:14 μ.μ., Gionatan Danti wrote:
While I fully understand & agree on the motivation for keeping Rocky
(and other clones) 1:1 with Red Hat, it should be understood that
current RHEL packages selection itself is drifting away from
small/medium business needs. So the core issue is a more fundamental
one: Red Hat, our upstream, is walking away from traditional server
needs.
IMHO, this is a more fundamental discussion, which is beyond future
CentOS versions and alternative RHEL-compatible projects and it
deserves a separate thread.
Sure.
In any case, I think that the existence and continuous availability /
maintenance of external RHEL / CentOS-compatible repositories probably
provides a solution for most use scenarios. Of course, I cannot
possibly know all actual needs, so I may be wrong.
I need to recognize the fact that it appears there is still a shortage
of packages for CentOS 8, even though it is active for quite long
already. Maybe this is mainly due to EPEL difficulties.
This is my impression also.
Regards.
--
Danti Gionatan
Supporto Tecnico
Assyoma S.r.l. - www.assyoma.it
email: g.danti@xxxxxxxxxx - info@xxxxxxxxxx
GPG public key ID: FF5F32A8
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
