On 07.07.21 18:04, Jon Pruente wrote:
On Wed, Jul 7, 2021 at 7:41 AM Leon Fauster via CentOS
<centos@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:centos@xxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Here is another one:
https://navylinux.org/ <https://navylinux.org/>
Navy Linux has a bad taste already, for me. They are aiming too big,
even trying to replicate EPEL for themselves. And their attitude isn't
good. They had a tweet disparaging "new unstable vendors" of EL distros
that they only deleted after being called out for it, despite being one
of those themselves.
Deleted tweet link:
https://twitter.com/NavyLinux/status/1408429562472677381
<https://twitter.com/NavyLinux/status/1408429562472677381>
They used to say they were founded by "Unixlab". Which Unixlab? We don't
know. Now they say they are a non-profit Foundation that founded the
project.
https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:kZLBFcdLyrYJ:https://navylinux.org/about/+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us
<https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:kZLBFcdLyrYJ:https://navylinux.org/about/+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us>
+1
The Division of Corporations in DELAWARE shows:
Formation Date: 6/14/2021 (mm/dd/yyyy)
Anyway, in the context of ongoing attacks to the supply chain.
This situation where CentOS is running EOL will motivate new
black hats to step into the place. Imagine a massive deployed
OS that is trojanized?!
So trust is here king and despite all adversity (that also hits me
hard) we should thinks twice before running away into foreign arms.
--
Leon
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
