Il 2021-07-08 23:21 J. Adam Craig ha scritto:
Well said. It is worth pointing out also that, while Kurtzer and other
Rocky community leads are devoted to keeping Rocky 1:1 with upstream,
they
are also committed to engaging with the CentOS Stream community
themselves
(if they find a bug in upstream code and they can fix it, Kurtzer and
others have stated multiple times that they will contribute the fix
into
Stream), and to encouraging such engagement among those who desire to
see
improvements with upstream. In other words, if we are uncomfortable
with
the direction Stream is going, the preferred approach is mobilisation
within and engagement with the Stream community to have those changes
realised there, so that they flow into Enterprise Linux and everyone
benefits.
While I fully understand & agree on the motivation for keeping Rocky
(and other clones) 1:1 with Red Hat, it should be understood that
current RHEL packages selection itself is drifting away from
small/medium business needs. So the core issue is a more fundamental
one: Red Hat, our upstream, is walking away from traditional server
needs.
So while I wish Rocky all the best (and I am actively using it!), I am
looking toward Ubuntu and Debian for new deployments.
Regards.
--
Danti Gionatan
Supporto Tecnico
Assyoma S.r.l. - www.assyoma.it
email: g.danti@xxxxxxxxxx - info@xxxxxxxxxx
GPG public key ID: FF5F32A8
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
