mark wrote:
> mark wrote:
>>
>> testing zfs. I'd created a zpoolz2, ran a large backup onto it. Then I
>> pulled one drive (11-drive, one hot spare pool), and it resilvered with
>> the hot spare. zpool status -x shows me state: DEGRADED status: One or
>> more devices could not be used because the label is missing or invalid.
>> Sufficient replicas exist for the pool to continue functioning
>> in a degraded state. action: Replace the device using 'zpool replace'.
>> see: http://zfsonlinux.org/msg/ZFS-8000-4J
>> scan: resilvered 1.91T in 29h33m with 0 errors on Tue Jun 11 15:45:59
>> 2019 config:
<snip>>
> Never mind. More googling, with different search terms, showed me that in
> this case, I had to use zpool online export1 /dev/sdb1.
<snip>
Ok, now, either zpool's confused, or I am. As I said, I did the online,
and now I have this:
export1 ONLINE 0 0 0
raidz2-0 ONLINE 0 0 0
sda ONLINE 0 0 0
spare-1 ONLINE 0 0 0
sdb ONLINE 0 0 0
sdl ONLINE 0 0 0
sdc ONLINE 0 0 0
sdd ONLINE 0 0 0
sde ONLINE 0 0 0
sdf ONLINE 0 0 0
sdg ONLINE 0 0 0
sdh ONLINE 0 0 0
sdi ONLINE 0 0 0
sdj ONLINE 0 0 0
sdk ONLINE 0 0 0
spares
sdl INUSE currently in use
1. Why is sdl there with sdb under "spare-1", and listed as "online",
while it's listed again under "spares", and "currently in use"? Do I have
to issue another manual command, to tell it to drop it out of the pool,
and let it go back to being *just* a spare?
mark
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
