mark wrote:
> Hi, folks,
>
>
> testing zfs. I'd created a zpoolz2, ran a large backup onto it. Then I
> pulled one drive (11-drive, one hot spare pool), and it resilvered with
> the hot spare. zpool status -x shows me state: DEGRADED
> status: One or more devices could not be used because the label is missing
> or invalid. Sufficient replicas exist for the pool to continue functioning
> in a degraded state. action: Replace the device using 'zpool replace'.
> see: http://zfsonlinux.org/msg/ZFS-8000-4J
> scan: resilvered 1.91T in 29h33m with 0 errors on Tue Jun 11 15:45:59 2019
> config:
>
>
> NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM
> export1 DEGRADED 0 0 0 raidz2-0 DEGRADED 0 0
> 0
> sda ONLINE 0 0 0 spare-1 DEGRADED 0 0 0 sdb
> UNAVAIL 0 0 0
> sdl ONLINE 0 0 0 sdc ONLINE 0 0 0 sdd
> ONLINE 0 0 0
> sde ONLINE 0 0 0 sdf ONLINE 0 0 0 sdg
> ONLINE 0 0 0
> sdh ONLINE 0 0 0 sdi ONLINE 0 0 0 sdj
> ONLINE 0 0 0
> sdk ONLINE 0 0 0 spares sdl INUSE
currently in
> use
>
> but when I try zpool replace export1 /dev/sdb1, it says, nope, invalid
> vdev specification use '-f' to override the following errors: /dev/sdb1 is
> part of active pool 'export1'
>
> Any idea what I'm doing wrong?
>
>
Never mind. More googling, with different search terms, showed me that in
this case, I had to use zpool online export1 /dev/sdb1.
I would have thought that zfs would undersand this automattically, and not
need me to tell it this, but....
mark
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
