-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 01/10/2012 03:04 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh@xxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>>
>>>> On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 7:47 AM, Daniel J Walsh
>>>>> <dwalsh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Now if only more people used RHEL we could further
>>>>>> enhance the products. :^)
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Why isn't it accepted as more of a standard?
>>>>>
>>>> I don't understand the question.
>>>
>>> Why is it vendor-specific to RHEL?
>>>
>> I was talking Money not vendor specific. The question meant as a
>> jab was if more people used RHEL instead of Centos, we could pay
>> more developers. I thought the @redhat.com would signify why I
>> would want that. :^)
>
> OK, I can understand why you would want that. I don't understand
> why you think anyone else would want even more nonstandard
> variations in linux distributions. And if this isn't intended to
> be vendor-specific, why isn't it an independent upstream project
> or included in the kernel?
>
> --- Les Mikesell lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx
Again, there is nothing that we do that is Vendor specific, Everything
we do with SELinux is open source. We are working to get our stuff
upstream.
I have no idea what you are talking about as far as variations in
Linux Distributions. I work regularly with people in Centos, RHEL,
gentoo, ubunto, debian, fedora and today even Mandriva. SELinux was
just released for android also. As I tweeted yesterday.
https://twitter.com/#!/rhatdan
http://selinuxproject.org/page/SEAndroid
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAk8MrQAACgkQrlYvE4MpobMAeACfXKfcoJpD2CNVAfCIeY7hEKhn
rBYAn3kxUoglq8xZZ5KjMIT+YKP9+XEN
=QXaL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
