On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 7:47 AM, Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Now if only more people used RHEL we could further enhance the
> products. :^)
>
Why isn't it accepted as more of a standard?
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: SELinux and access across 'similar types'
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: CentOS mailing list <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: SELinux and access across 'similar types'
- From: Les Mikesell <lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 08:00:51 -0600
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <4F0C416D.5080801@redhat.com>
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: SELinux and access across 'similar types'
- From: Daniel J Walsh
- Re: SELinux and access across 'similar types'
- References:
- SELinux and access across 'similar types'
- From: Bennett Haselton
- Re: SELinux and access across 'similar types'
- From: Tony Molloy
- Re: SELinux and access across 'similar types'
- From: Daniel J Walsh
- Re: SELinux and access across 'similar types'
- From: Marko Vojinovic
- Re: SELinux and access across 'similar types'
- From: Bennett Haselton
- Re: SELinux and access across 'similar types'
- From: Daniel J Walsh
- SELinux and access across 'similar types'
- Prev by Date: Re: defense-in-depth possible for sshd?
- Next by Date: Re: sa-update error with perl
- Previous by thread: Re: SELinux and access across 'similar types'
- Next by thread: Re: SELinux and access across 'similar types'
- Index(es):
 |