Re: SELinux and access across 'similar types'

[Les Mikesell <lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 8:27 AM, Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 01/10/2012 09:00 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 7:47 AM, Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Now if only more people used RHEL we could further enhance the
>>> products.  :^)
>>>
>>
>> Why isn't it accepted as more of a standard?
>>
> I don't understand the question.

Why is it vendor-specific to RHEL?

-- 
  Les Mikesell
    lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos