Re: SELinux and access across 'similar types'

[Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh@xxxxxxxxxx>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 01/10/2012 11:20 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 8:27 AM, Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh@xxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>> 
>> On 01/10/2012 09:00 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 7:47 AM, Daniel J Walsh
>>> <dwalsh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Now if only more people used RHEL we could further enhance
>>>> the products.  :^)
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> Why isn't it accepted as more of a standard?
>>> 
>> I don't understand the question.
> 
> Why is it vendor-specific to RHEL?
> 
I was talking Money not vendor specific. The question meant as a jab
was if more people used RHEL instead of Centos, we could pay more
developers.  I thought the @redhat.com would signify why I would want
that.  :^)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk8MlXwACgkQrlYvE4MpobN0+QCguSaHEiMoNRrNh0YyAZA5f8B4
yJMAoLKFGdmHimjZ+QG/IFOD5W5K3QPO
=Ra86
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos