Re: 40TB File System Recommendations

["Sorin Srbu" <sorin.srbu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

>-----Original Message-----
>From: centos-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:centos-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
>Of Christopher Chan
>Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2011 2:34 PM
>To: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: Re:  40TB File System Recommendations
>>>
>>> Oh yeah, we are on PCIe and NUMA architectures now. I guess this point
>>> no longer applies just like hardware raid being crap no longer applies
>>> because they are not underpowered i960/tiny cache boards anymore.
>>
>> I'm sorry, I can't quite "read you". Is your reply meant to be sarcastic? If
I
>> misunderstood it, I apologize.
>>
>> Anyway, what I meant before was that I haven't really the problem with
smaller
>> systems, like for eg department backups. Maybe up to 10TB-file systems, with
not
>> too many user's homefolders, in the hundreds maybe, but still a lot of data
>> being transferred each day.
>
>I know what you meant...and yes, the bus has plenty of bandwidth to not
>have to worry unless you are sticking it on a 1x lane slot.

Gotcha'. Thanks.

-- 
/Sorin


_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos