Re: 40TB File System Recommendations

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



>-----Original Message-----
>From: centos-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:centos-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
>Of Matthew Feinberg
>Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2011 9:29 AM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re:  40TB File System Recommendations
>
>Hardware or software raid. Is there an advantage either way on such a
>large array?

Doesn't that depend on what sort of backup solution you're planning, and the
level of "criticalness" of the backups saved?

Some say that for more serious raid solutions, hardware is the way to go, while
software raids are sort of a middle-road.

Me, I usually go with software raid. I've had one too many hardware raid
failures where I haven't been able to restore the data contained. With software
raid a restore has always worked fine for me, especially broken raids in
Windows. While raid in Windows isn't overly performance-inclined, I've come to
appreciate the software ditto in linux - both performance and stability is
top-notch IMHO.

With today's CPU-performance and RAM available, software raids are not a problem
to power.

-- 
/Sorin


_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux