On Wednesday, April 13, 2011 09:18 PM, Ross Walker wrote:
> On Apr 13, 2011, at 8:45 AM, Christopher Chan<christopher.chan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> On Wednesday, April 13, 2011 04:00 PM, Sorin Srbu wrote:
>>
>>> With today's CPU-performance and RAM available, software raids are not a problem
>>> to power.
>>>
>>
>> That depends. Software raid is fine for raid1 and raid0. If you want
>> raid5 or raid6, you have to use hardware raid with bbu cache that
>> matches the size of the array notwithstanding the limiting to 10 disks
>> max. consideration.
>>
>> cpu performance/amount of RAM available is a non-issue and has been for
>> a decade.
>
> The battery backed cache is essential in avoiding the parity write hole as well as avoiding the performance penalty of short writes, those less then the stripe width where the remaining chunks need to be read to calculate the new parity, as the cache can attempt to cache the write until it gets a full stripe width and/or cache future writes until the read-calc-write is completed.
>
While we are at it, disks being directly connected to the raid card will
mean there won't be bus contention from nics and what not whereas
software raid 5/6 would have to deal with that.
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
