Re: 40TB File System Recommendations

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Wednesday, April 13, 2011 10:32 PM, Sorin Srbu wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: centos-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:centos-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
>> Of Christopher Chan
>> Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2011 3:45 PM
>> To: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: Re:  40TB File System Recommendations
>>
>> While we are at it, disks being directly connected to the raid card will
>> mean there won't be bus contention from nics and what not whereas
>> software raid 5/6 would have to deal with that.
>
> Could that really be an issue as well? What kind of traffic levels are we
> speaking of now? Approximately? That is to say, in as much this can be
> quantified at all.
>
> I've never really seen this problem.

Oh yeah, we are on PCIe and NUMA architectures now. I guess this point 
no longer applies just like hardware raid being crap no longer applies 
because they are not underpowered i960/tiny cache boards anymore.
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux