Karsten, On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 10:06 PM Karsten Wade <kwade@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi all, > > There is now a draft permission letter working it's way through the > CentOS Board. It is intended to cover permission for just the GNOME > Project's use with GNOME Boxes. This is *really* good news! > > I am still pursuing resolving this within the guidelines, that will take > more time. What does it mean, exactly? Does it mean that a logo, as the one done for docker, will be prepared for Boxes usage meanwhile or that we'll have to solve the guidelines issues as the first thing? Thanks a lot for helping us here! > > Best regards, > > - Karsten > > On 10/16/2018 07:10 AM, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote: > > People, > > > > On Wed, 2018-09-19 at 09:28 -0700, Karsten Wade wrote: > >> On 09/19/2018 03:35 AM, Pablo Sebastián Greco wrote: > >>> From someone who doesn't know anything about design/legal, what is > >>> the > >>> difference between this instance and what was done in point 7.3 of > >>> the > >>> link (7.3. For special sub-projects)? > >> > >> Essentially similar, in that specific permission was granted and a > >> specific logo was prepared. In this case, the permission has been > >> requested and there is not a corresponding logo prepared on the > >> ArtWork > >> page. > >> > >>> BTW, that is the logo only; > >> > >> There are two aspects here: > >> > >> 1. Should the project allow for the graphical logo to be used without > >> the wordmark? > >> > >> 2. If yes to 1, the project should adjust one or both guidelines to > >> make > >> it explicit what can and cannot be done. > >> > >> For #1 it may be that we want to do so for various cases, but there > >> may > >> be reasons and risks we are not aware of in using the logo stand- > >> alone > >> in various situations. For this I am seeking expert advice. > >> > >> As it happens, the trademark guidelines do allow for some uses of > >> just > >> the logo, point 5 here: > >> > >> https://www.centos.org/legal/trademarks/#acceptable-uses > >> > >> But there is not a corresponding graphic and how-to on the ArtWork > >> page. > >> > >> What I want to do is i) as quickly as we can resolve the question of > >> permission for GNOME so they can move on with their development, and > >> ii) > >> fix any actual or perceived inconsistencies between the trademark > >> guidelines and the logo usage guidelines. > > > > Any news here? > > > > Best Regards, > > > > -- > Karsten Wade | Community Architect | @quaid > Red Hat Open Source and Standards (OSAS) : @redhatopen > https://community.redhat.com | https://next.redhat.com | https://osci.io > gpg: AD0E0C41 | https://red.ht/sig > Best Regards, -- Fabiano Fidêncio _______________________________________________ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@xxxxxxxxxx https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
