Hi all, There is now a draft permission letter working it's way through the CentOS Board. It is intended to cover permission for just the GNOME Project's use with GNOME Boxes. I am still pursuing resolving this within the guidelines, that will take more time. Best regards, - Karsten On 10/16/2018 07:10 AM, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote: > People, > > On Wed, 2018-09-19 at 09:28 -0700, Karsten Wade wrote: >> On 09/19/2018 03:35 AM, Pablo Sebastián Greco wrote: >>> From someone who doesn't know anything about design/legal, what is >>> the >>> difference between this instance and what was done in point 7.3 of >>> the >>> link (7.3. For special sub-projects)? >> >> Essentially similar, in that specific permission was granted and a >> specific logo was prepared. In this case, the permission has been >> requested and there is not a corresponding logo prepared on the >> ArtWork >> page. >> >>> BTW, that is the logo only; >> >> There are two aspects here: >> >> 1. Should the project allow for the graphical logo to be used without >> the wordmark? >> >> 2. If yes to 1, the project should adjust one or both guidelines to >> make >> it explicit what can and cannot be done. >> >> For #1 it may be that we want to do so for various cases, but there >> may >> be reasons and risks we are not aware of in using the logo stand- >> alone >> in various situations. For this I am seeking expert advice. >> >> As it happens, the trademark guidelines do allow for some uses of >> just >> the logo, point 5 here: >> >> https://www.centos.org/legal/trademarks/#acceptable-uses >> >> But there is not a corresponding graphic and how-to on the ArtWork >> page. >> >> What I want to do is i) as quickly as we can resolve the question of >> permission for GNOME so they can move on with their development, and >> ii) >> fix any actual or perceived inconsistencies between the trademark >> guidelines and the logo usage guidelines. > > Any news here? > > Best Regards, > -- Karsten Wade | Community Architect | @quaid Red Hat Open Source and Standards (OSAS) : @redhatopen https://community.redhat.com | https://next.redhat.com | https://osci.io gpg: AD0E0C41 | https://red.ht/sig
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@xxxxxxxxxx https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
