On Thu, 8 Oct 2009, Ralph Angenendt wrote: > On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 8:53 PM, R P Herrold <herrold at centos.org> wrote: >> By carrying two wiki, we avoid that workload, and can have a >> self-serve model for getting commits in the 'projects.' one, >> and the moderated approach on the vetted one. > > Bleh. And I mean really Bleh. Putting documentation into two different > places absolutely sucks. agreed [... I would limit what we do to CentOS specific extension doco only ... but cannot attain consensus on that] -- but it sucks less badly than the abandoned mess at (I did a minimal fixup and threw up my hands in disgust -- what shall I do with it?): http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Xen/MoveNative2DomU We have a track record of putting support in lots of channels Compare: #centos, which I designed a centos-specific question focus, with a training aspect for purposes that are not general, and #centos-social for the back chatter to permit a 'relief valve' to point people at. As a result we have a vibrant #centos which is 'a little different' and MUCH more usable and useful than ##linux or some closed upstream focused 'competitive channels' -- the results attained over time do the talking. -- Russ herrold
