On Fri, 2 Oct 2009, Ralph Angenendt wrote: > On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 10:33 PM, Brian Mathis > <brian.mathis+centosdocs at gmail.com> wrote: > >> What you currently have is the "lock model", and with few admins the >> idea of opening up the system seems like a bad one because those >> admins will need to deal with all those errors, but this is not the >> case. ?As soon as it's open, you'll have more people monitoring and >> more people who can fix errors as they are introduced. > > We already have > 70 people who would be able to do so (no idea how > many of these accounts are still in use). Do I see those going over > pages? Rarely, it's nearly always the same persons. Could it be that entry to collaborate is not low enough to make it work ? If you have too many rules, people might be afraid/unable to make the necessary fix. Especially if it requires sending a mail and decision by committee. My worries are that you are taking something for granted that is caused by the current rules, to keep those rules in place. -- -- dag wieers, dag at wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/ -- [Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors]
