On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 7:05 PM, Ed Heron <Ed at heron-ent.com> wrote: > ?From my point of view, the process wasn't onerous in itself. ?The only > issues I had/have are the sparse guidelines of acceptable content and the > voracity of the reaction, by some, to what they viewed as unacceptable > content. ?It appears there are multiple standards for content. This is true. While I'm for rather more content (as long as quality doesn't go down) others have a different view of that. And I think we have to find some common ground here. > ?For aspiring content producers that suggest modification to existing > content, those changes should go through the page's creator or maintainer or > someone else in the edit group. ?If they describe the changes on this list, > it should be a simple matter for someone else to implement or possibly give > them access to that page. ?Once those people have sufficient history, I > assume adding them to the edit group so they can make changes directly would > follow. This is roughly how it is working at the moment, if I didn't misunderstand you. Cheers, Ralph
