On Tue, 6 Oct 2009, Ed Heron wrote: > It appears that the people who are preferring the more restricted content > guidelines are saying they will accept content separation. But having 2 > separate content systems seems redundant. Is there a way to have a section > (directory) of the wiki that is core and an expanded section? This might > satisfy both sides? Goodness -- wiki.centos.org and wiki.projects.centos.org is too hard or better somehow than wiki.centos.org and wiki.centos.org/projects/ where './projects' content carries a 'this content is not as carefully vetted' disclaimer? The second approach sounds like more of a slam than living in a 'projects.' sub-domain to me. A refactoring of the personal homepages will have to happen in any event, and perhaps we should simply have a './personal/' in the main wiki and move all such into it ... but this then carries the expense of refactoring all the 'at the ./' point documentary narrative down a level as well. ACL errors will be harder to avoid as well By carrying two wiki, we avoid that workload, and can have a self-serve model for getting commits in the 'projects.' one, and the moderated approach on the vetted one. My $0.02 -- Russ herrold
