[lsb-discuss] LSB 3.2 Embedded Profile

[carlos.duclos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (Carlos Manuel Duclos Vergara)]

On Thursday 17 April 2008 19:29:36 Dan Kohn wrote:
> So, just to update the original proposal, we're talking about an "LSB
> 3.2 CGL Profile" that is the same as LSB 3.2 except that it doesn't
> include the X, GTK, qt, or CUPS libraries.  A distro can only qualify
> for the CGL profile if they ship neither GTK nor qt as part of their
> standard install.
> 
> Current 3.2 libraries are listed here:
> https://www.linux-foundation.org/navigator/browse/library.php?changever=3.2&changearch=1
> 
> Based on this definition of the CGL profile being a strict subset of
> LSB 3.2, any application that was certified to the LSB CGL 3.2 profile
> would also be certified to LSB 3.2.
> 

Now that I reread this, shouldn't it be the other way around? I mean, if you are LSB 3.2 certified
for sure you are CGL, but if you are CGL then by definition you do not fulfill LSB 3.2 requirements....


-- 
Carlos Manuel Duclos Vergara
carlos.duclos at trolltech.com
QA Team Lead