On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 06:30:48PM +0200, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote: > Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > Shung-Hsi Yu <shung-hsi.yu@xxxxxxxx> writes: > > > >> Patch based on Andrii's analysis. > >> > >> Given that both BPF_END and BPF_NEG always operates on dst_reg itself > >> and that bt_is_reg_set(bt, dreg) was already checked I believe we can > >> just return with no futher action. > > > > Alright, manually applied this to bpf-next and indeed this enables the > > netobserv-bpf-agent to load successfully. Care to submit a formal patch? > > In that case please add my: > > > > Tested-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Thanks! > > Friendly ping - are you planning to submit an official patch for this? :) Yes, I do plan to send an offical one along with selftest as Alexei has suggested. Once I've got my irrational fear of writing selftests overcame ;) Should have it out before the end of this week. Shung-Hsi > -Toke
