Shung-Hsi Yu <shung-hsi.yu@xxxxxxxx> writes: > On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 06:30:48PM +0200, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote: >> Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> > Shung-Hsi Yu <shung-hsi.yu@xxxxxxxx> writes: >> > >> >> Patch based on Andrii's analysis. >> >> >> >> Given that both BPF_END and BPF_NEG always operates on dst_reg itself >> >> and that bt_is_reg_set(bt, dreg) was already checked I believe we can >> >> just return with no futher action. >> > >> > Alright, manually applied this to bpf-next and indeed this enables the >> > netobserv-bpf-agent to load successfully. Care to submit a formal patch? >> > In that case please add my: >> > >> > Tested-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@xxxxxxxxxx> >> > >> > Thanks! >> >> Friendly ping - are you planning to submit an official patch for this? :) > > Yes, I do plan to send an offical one along with selftest as Alexei has > suggested. Once I've got my irrational fear of writing selftests overcame ;) > > Should have it out before the end of this week. Alright great! Didn't mean to rush you, just wanted to double check that you were planning to submit this :) Thanks! -Toke
