Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Shung-Hsi Yu <shung-hsi.yu@xxxxxxxx> writes: > >> Patch based on Andrii's analysis. >> >> Given that both BPF_END and BPF_NEG always operates on dst_reg itself >> and that bt_is_reg_set(bt, dreg) was already checked I believe we can >> just return with no futher action. > > Alright, manually applied this to bpf-next and indeed this enables the > netobserv-bpf-agent to load successfully. Care to submit a formal patch? > In that case please add my: > > Tested-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Thanks! Friendly ping - are you planning to submit an official patch for this? :) -Toke
