Re: [PATCH bpf] bpf, docs: Better scale maintenance of BPF subsystem

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 6/27/22 10:38 PM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 1:30 PM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[...]
vger continues to cause trouble and it doesn't sound that the fix is coming.
So having everyone directly cc-ed is the only option we have.

Yeah, Exhibit A - vger is lagging right now...
I guess the "real fix" is on the vger, trying to massage MAINTAINERS
now is not a great use of time..

The real fix is to move away from vger and adjust get_maintainer
script to be smarter when the mailer can do its job.
MAINTAINERS file should list everyone who performs code reviews
and maintains the code.

Agree to all above. I think to address Jakub's concern, we could adapt
this regex similarly as we have in XDP and move this as a remainder to
a misc/noise section, like below:

diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index dbf978014e8a..b5a1960c8339 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -3657,8 +3657,6 @@ F:        scripts/pahole-version.sh
 F:     tools/bpf/
 F:     tools/lib/bpf/
 F:     tools/testing/selftests/bpf/
-N:     bpf
-K:     bpf

 BPF JIT for ARM
 M:     Shubham Bansal <illusionist.neo@xxxxxxxxx>
@@ -3850,6 +3848,11 @@ L:       bpf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
 S:     Maintained
 F:     tools/testing/selftests/bpf/

+BPF [MISC]
+L:     bpf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
+S:     Odd Fixes
+K:     (?:\b|_)bpf(?:\b|_)
+
 BROADCOM B44 10/100 ETHERNET DRIVER
 M:     Michael Chan <michael.chan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
 L:     netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

If there are no objections, I can fold this in..

Thanks,
Daniel



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux