Re: [PATCH bpf] bpf, docs: Better scale maintenance of BPF subsystem

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 27 Jun 2022 12:57:21 -0700 Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> And that's a good thing.

My concern is that folks will rebel against populating the CC list if
they never receive feedback from the CCed. I often have to go and
manually trim the CC list because I don't think Jiri, KP, Yonghong etc.
care about my random TLS patch, or removal of a driver which happens 
to contain the letters "bpf". I was hoping the delegation you're
performing could help with the large Cc list. Would you perhaps
consider moving the K/N regexes to the "Core" entry? It'd lower 
the pain of false positives.

> vger continues to cause trouble and it doesn't sound that the fix is coming.
> So having everyone directly cc-ed is the only option we have.

Yeah, Exhibit A - vger is lagging right now...
I guess the "real fix" is on the vger, trying to massage MAINTAINERS
now is not a great use of time..



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux