Re: [PATCH bpf] bpf, docs: Better scale maintenance of BPF subsystem

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 27 Jun 2022 20:22:55 +0200 Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> -BPF (Safe dynamic programs and tools)
> +BPF [GENERAL] (Safe Dynamic Programs and Tools)
>  M:	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@xxxxxxxxxx>
>  M:	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>  M:	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@xxxxxxxxxx>
> -R:	Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@xxxxxx>
> -R:	Song Liu <songliubraving@xxxxxx>
> +R:	Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@xxxxxxxxx>
> +R:	Song Liu <song@xxxxxxxxxx>
>  R:	Yonghong Song <yhs@xxxxxx>
>  R:	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@xxxxxxxxx>
>  R:	KP Singh <kpsingh@xxxxxxxxxx>
> -L:	netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> +R:	Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@xxxxxxxxxx>
> +R:	Hao Luo <haoluo@xxxxxxxxxx>
> +R:	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx>
>  L:	bpf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>  S:	Supported
>  W:	https://bpf.io/

Can we pause and think a bit about the purpose for this entry? I've been
trying to make people obey get_maintainer.pl but having to CC 11 people
is a asking a lot - especially that this entry regexp-keys on BPF (K:
bpf N: bpf). So any patch that as much as uses the letters "bpf" gets
an enormous CC list.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux