On Mon, 27 Jun 2022 20:22:55 +0200 Daniel Borkmann wrote: > -BPF (Safe dynamic programs and tools) > +BPF [GENERAL] (Safe Dynamic Programs and Tools) > M: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@xxxxxxxxxx> > M: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > M: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@xxxxxxxxxx> > -R: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@xxxxxx> > -R: Song Liu <songliubraving@xxxxxx> > +R: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@xxxxxxxxx> > +R: Song Liu <song@xxxxxxxxxx> > R: Yonghong Song <yhs@xxxxxx> > R: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@xxxxxxxxx> > R: KP Singh <kpsingh@xxxxxxxxxx> > -L: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > +R: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@xxxxxxxxxx> > +R: Hao Luo <haoluo@xxxxxxxxxx> > +R: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx> > L: bpf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > S: Supported > W: https://bpf.io/ Can we pause and think a bit about the purpose for this entry? I've been trying to make people obey get_maintainer.pl but having to CC 11 people is a asking a lot - especially that this entry regexp-keys on BPF (K: bpf N: bpf). So any patch that as much as uses the letters "bpf" gets an enormous CC list.