On Wed, 2023-11-08 at 12:05 -0800, Alexei Starovoitov wrote: [...] > The algorithm doesn't look simple. > Even if we change llvm to do this, it's not clear whether > the verifier will be able to consume such code. Actually, I don't think that trampoline jumps could cause any trouble. > imo it's too much effort to address a non-issue. > I'd just adjust the pyperf180.c test. Ok, I'll drop this. Thank you for taking a look.
