Re: [PATCH v5 bpf-next 10/23] selftests/bpf: BPF register range bounds tester

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2023-11-08 at 15:23 -0800, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
[...]

> > It is a maintenance burden in a way.
> 
> It's unlikely to need changes, so I hope it won't be. But it's also
> good to have as a cross-check for future work, like Shung-Hsi Yu's
> attempt to make range tracking sign-agnostic.

Testing for non-functional changes is a good point.
Anyways, I don't have a better alternatives to suggest at the moment.

Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@xxxxxxxxx>

[...]





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux