Re: Fedora 40 workstation status

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Well, I didn't use Fedora while I ran Debian, then Ubuntu, then Arch. I
guess that was at least 9 years. Then again, I didn't switch off Fedora
due to a lack of accessibility. In fact, Fedora has been one of the most
accessible distros I've used, with the possible exception of Ubuntu,
speaking from an installer standpoint, although I have heard that Ubuntu
had some installer problems fairly recently. I did put Ubuntu on one
client's laptop a few years back and had no problems installing or
running it, and then I put Fedora on another client's laptop about a
year or so later and also had no problems with the installation or even
a test run of various software applications. I have successfully run
Fedora Linux on the machine where I write this message since 35 though,
so although there was not a problem installing 35, I have not tried
newer installers, so there may be some problems there. Add to this the
fact that for some time, it wasn't making any sound in a VM and I didn't
want to reinstall over my bare metal installation that I use every day.
In any case, I have no idea where this article comes from talking about
Fedora not being accessible for 9 years. That just seems odd to me. I
can however see where there may be problems installing it, as I just
haven't tested that recently. Once I got it up and running using the
installer that at that time was near 100% with Orca, I just updated and
upgraded, never using the newer Anaconda installer. I should at some
point grab a 40 Workstation and pop it into a VM to see whether it talks
now, a project for this weekend perhaps.

~Kyle

Imetumwa kutoka vidole vyangu

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to blinux-list+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxx.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Speakup]     [Fedora]     [Linux Kernel]     [Yosemite News]     [Big List of Linux Books]