See I usually throw a terminal/console text editor in on any CLI only
systems/installs for that reason, or for working in a TTY when I want to
edit stuff or am on an SSH connection. It's always nice to have a
simple, easy to use editor in my pocket so if my desktop falls over or I
need to SSH into a machine I can just do nano filename and get right to
work without having to fight an editor that thinks it knows what I want.
No. I just want to get in, edit text, save, and get things donen.
On 11/29/21 21:31, Linux for blind general discussion wrote:
Unless you are running a text-only installation, installing from
scratch, editing configs before you have a desktop environment
installed or working remotely, your best bet is going to be whatever
editor comes with your desktop environment. Usually that will be
either pluma on the MATE desktop, gedit on the GNOME desktop, or you
may have leafpad or mousepad installed. Any of these give you very
easy cut/copy/paste functionality, easy to use find/replace pop-up
windows and a fully accessible menu system for doing other things. All
these editors are fully accessible to Orca and are found in your
accessories menu or its equivalent depending on your desktop.
If you are looking for a terminal-based text editor, usually for
installing a system manually or working remotely via ssh, the best and
easiest to use by far is nano, although I usually like to use pluma
even over ssh, since sshfs mounts my servers as if they are on the
local disk, so I get access to every file on my servers just as if
they are right on the computer I'm using to access them. I have edited
server configs and even websites in this way.
Forget EMACS. I gave up on that crap after 5 minutes of mucking about
in it, and emacspeak didn't make it any better. A text editor should
make it as easy as possible to edit text, and that is all. It
shouldn't require a computer science degree, nor should it try to be a
complete desktop that tries to turn every application into an editor.
The editors I mention here are mostly straight-forward, with the
possible exception of nano, which is mostly consistent with pico, but
not so consistent with any other desktop editor, and they all do what
they should and nothing extra or overly complicated. If you want
complicated text handling and word processing, LibreOffice Writer is
the way to go, as it's a sophisticated word processor, not a text editor.
~Kyle
_______________________________________________
Blinux-list mailing list
Blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list
_______________________________________________
Blinux-list mailing list
Blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list