Re: installing bsd with speech

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I will have to dig up the old info on server jails. It might be related to application jails.

-eric

On Mar 22, 2017, at 7:32 PM, Tim Chase wrote:

> On March 22, 2017, Eric Oyen wrote:
>> I have been a pro user of OpenBSD for years. It was a lot easier to
>> use when all I had to deal with was low vision on a big display.
>> 
>> Pros to OpenBSD:
>> 1. best firewall out there, hands down
> 
> Agreed
> 
>> 2. application jails
>> 3. server jails
> 
> Could you point me to info on this?  I know that OpenBSD has chroot
> and a few other features like systrace, but I haven't seen anything
> comparable to FreeBSD's full jails.
> 
>> 5. able to run on 2 GB or less reliably
> 
> This is a nice plus.  FreeBSD (without ZFS) can do this, as can at
> least Debian as I have several boxes with 2GB of RAM or less.  Though
> I'd note that OpenBSD can run remarkably comfortably in 256MB of RAM
> which is a lot harder for other OSes to do.
> 
>> 6. takes minimal disk space for all but an X-desktop installation
> 
> even with X, it's pretty svelte.  I just installed a fresh OpenBSD
> with X but no additional packages yet, and the entire install clocks
> in at under 570MB.  Foregoing X saves you about 200MB.
> 
> -tim
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Blinux-list mailing list
> Blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list


_______________________________________________
Blinux-list mailing list
Blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Speakup]     [Fedora]     [Linux Kernel]     [Yosemite News]     [Big List of Linux Books]