Re: installing bsd with speech

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



ok, now I know this is going outside the usual Linux for the blind discussion, but: how am I supposed to access the install media on a BSD installation, when the installer isn't running an SSH session that would allow me to? sounds a bit like Chicken and the Egg, don't you think?

-eric

On Mar 21, 2017, at 5:17 AM, Kelly Prescott wrote:

> I have just discovered that the updates to the kernel in archlinux makes speakup not talk with the curses console output.
> I have not had time to figure out why, but a work around is to use ssh into the box you are running qemu on and that solves the problem.
> kp
> 
> 
> 
> On Fri, 17 Mar 2017, Kelly Prescott wrote:
> 
>> Ok, there is not a link, here is what I do.
>> Make sure you are logged into your system at a text console with speakup running.
>> ***DO*** not do this in a X session or it will not work.
>> 
>> I create a image file.
>> qemu-img create -o size=16G -f raw openbsd.img
>> Change to taste.
>> Here is the qemu install command I use for the current release.
>> 
>> qemu-system-x86_64  -enable-kvm -soundhw ac97 -machine type=pc,accel=kvm -curses -m 1024 -cdrom install60.iso -boot order=d openbsd.img
>> Here is the command I use once the install is finished for normal booting.
>> qemu-system-x86_64  -enable-kvm -soundhw ac97 -machine type=pc,accel=kvm
>> -curses -m 1024 openbsd.img
>> 
>> Remember, these commands are probably put on more than one line by the mailer software.
>> This works on anything with a text-based install, freebsd, netbsd, openbsd, pfsense etc...
>> 
>> Have fun.
>> 
>> 
>> On Thu, 16 Mar 2017, Eric Oyen wrote:
>> 
>>> ok, can you send me the link with how to do that? I would certainly
>>> appreciate it a lot.
>>> 
>>> -eric
>>> from the central office of the Technomage Guild, Access technology
>>> Division 6.
>>> 
>>> On Mar 16, 2017, at 8:30 PM, Kelly Prescott wrote:
>>> >  I use BSD all the time.
>>> >  I use Qemu to set them up.
>>> >  This gives me the text consoles and I can install them and speakup does >  the work.
>>> >  I do NetBSD, OpenBSD and FreeBSD all that way.
>>> >  once they are installed, I just ssh to them.
>>> > > > > >  On Thu, 16 Mar 2017, Eric Oyen wrote:
>>> > > >  that was one of the things I tried. I never could get it to work. Of > >  course, someone may have properly ported it since I last tried some 4 > >  years ago.
>>> > > > >  the only thing severely lacking in OpenBSD is braille/speech support > >  in the installation. I mean, seriously, its a text based console > >  environment so it should be rather easy to do, but getting Theo to see > >  that is like pulling Teeth!
>>> > > > >  oh well, I will get a little sighted assistance here in the next few > >  days and get an image setup under vmware. then I can get the post > >  config done and actually be able to log into it. at that point, it > >  should be relatively easy to add the ports tree and compile BrlTTY.
>>> > > > > > > > >  meanwhile, back to the actual issue at hand…. Does anyone here > >  remember openSuse? I spent more than a year trying to get them to make > >  their product accessible. Their version of Linux had some nice > >  features, but it wouldn't work with any screen readers and there were > >  no packages for such either. I kept asking on their forums and > >  eventually a developer chimed in and stated they had no interest in > >  making their product accessible (claiming too much work, etc. etc.). > >  That was 7 years ago and they are still not accessible. So, it isn't > >  just fedora that has an issue with us.
>>> > > > >  so, my question is this: why is Vinux now merging with SONAR (a Fedora > >  based project) when Fedora is known to have little interest in our > >  needs? I don't know about the rest of you, but it seems to me that we > >  are being treated like the red headed step child here.
>>> > > > >  -eric
>>> > >  from the central office of the Technomage Guild, access technology > >  division 6.
>>> > > > >  On Mar 16, 2017, at 2:00 PM, Anders Holmberg wrote:
>>> > > > > >  Hi!
>>> > > >  I think you can build brltty for bsd.
>>> > > >  But i am not sure.
>>> > > >  And that requiers a braille display.
>>> > > >  /A
>>> > > > >  16 mars 2017 kl. 21:57 skrev Eric Oyen <eric.oyen@xxxxxxxxxx>:
>>> > > > > > > > >  and now we see the crux of the issue. its called a lack of proper > > > >  attention to the problem.
>>> > > > > > > > >  this is the biggest holdup to a lot of us blind folks, lack of > > > >  coherent information. It's most telling in the local activities > > > >  and events arena, but it shows up in technology as well. SOunds > > > >  like it's time to spread the news on FB, swarm, snap chat, > > > >  twitter, and any other social media outlet we can find. I might > > > >  even point this article at Theo De Raadt of OpenBSD and see if he > > > >  will actually consider it.. It would be nice to have a little > > > >  support from some of the big names behind alternative Operating > > > >  systems (like the BSD ecology or the Linux ecology). In fact, I > > > >  will cc this missive to them. I doubt it will get any sort of > > > >  useful response, but there is no harm in trying.
>>> > > > > > > > >  btw, I was involved in trying to get a screen reader working in > > > >  OpenBSD. It was speakeasy and it failed rather ignominiously. > > > >  Since I am not a coder, I didn't exactly have the tools required > > > >  to properly port it. what I ended up with only partially worked. > > > >  Getting any help from the OpenBSD development corps was a lost > > > >  cause right from the outset. Here it is over 4 years later and I > > > >  have one since given up on ever getting some help from them. > > > >  Perhaps it's time that a bunch of us bug Theo directly. if he gets > > > >  enough emails on the subject, he might reconsider his position. > > > >  His developer email is Theo de Raadt <deraadt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> > > > > > > > >  anyway, it also sounds like we need to get everyone else in the > > > >  community of the blind on board with this. that means hitting up > > > >  the various lighthouse organizations, the NFB, the ACB, and the > > > >  AFB as well as the world blind union. SInce I am also on a number > > > >  of technology lists dedicated to blind users and technology > > > >  (including almost all of the mac lists for the blind), it > > > >  shouldn't be that hard to get this information out. perhaps > > > >  partnering up with a few of the bigger blindness blogs wouldn't > > > >  hurt either.
>>> > > > > > > > >  -eric
>>> > > > >  from the central office of the Technomage Guild, access technology > > > >  division 6.
>>> > > > > > > > >  On Mar 16, 2017, at 8:39 AM, John G Heim wrote:
>>> > > > > > > > > >  It's funny you should say it's long overdue for there to be a > > > > >  blindness related non-profit. I was part of a group who created > > > > >  exactly that several years ago. After much discussion, we called > > > > >  ourselves The International Association Of Visually Impaired > > > > >  Technologists or IAVIT. See www.iavit.org.
>>> > > > > > > > > > >  After creating the non-profit, the real problem has been lack of > > > > >  interest in using it's resources. We are incorporated as a 501c3 > > > > >  in the USA so we can legally accept donations. We have a lawyer, > > > > >  a bank account, a paypal account at the non-profit rates, > > > > >  donated server space, etc. The entire infrastructure is there. > > > > >  We're just waiting for people to say, "Hey, I could use this or > > > > >  that."
>>> > > > > > > > > > >  On 03/16/2017 07:53 AM, Tony Baechler wrote:
>>> > > > > > >  Be warned that my comments are most likely unpopular and > > > > > >  controversial.
>>> > > > > > >  See below. I'm not really interested in discussing this > > > > > >  further, so
>>> > > > > > >  don't expect a response.
>>> > > > > > > > > > > > >  On 3/15/2017 3:30 AM, Kyle wrote:
>>> > > > > > > >  Sonar merges with the Vinux Project.
>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >  Well, this is indeed unfortunate. First, it was never said > > > > > >  what "common
>>> > > > > > >  goals" were discussed. Granted I don't closely follow either > > > > > >  project,
>>> > > > > > >  but I'm disappointed and surprised to see Vinux heading > > > > > >  towards a Fedora
>>> > > > > > >  base. Red Hat has stated many, even numerous times, both in > > > > > >  their
>>> > > > > > >  inaction and in published docs on their sites, that they have > > > > > >  no or very
>>> > > > > > >  little interest in core accessibility. Yes, I realize this > > > > > >  list is
>>> > > > > > >  hosted by Red Hat, but honestly, anyone can host a mailing > > > > > >  list
>>> > > > > > >  nowadays, so to me, that doesn't count. Look at groups.io, > > > > > >  Yahoo Groups,
>>> > > > > > >  etc. Unlike Debian, Ubuntu and Slackware, to the best of my > > > > > >  knowledge,
>>> > > > > > >  Fedora has never made their installer accessible out of the > > > > > >  box. I
>>> > > > > > >  understand that now their installer talks with Orca, but I > > > > > >  think that's
>>> > > > > > >  more by accident than anything. Fedora does claim to have > > > > > >  accessibility
>>> > > > > > >  with the Gnome desktop though, but I don't think one can > > > > > >  easily use
>>> > > > > > >  Speakup and a text console to do the install. I could very > > > > > >  well be wrong
>>> > > > > > >  on this as I quit following Fedora years ago for the above > > > > > >  reasons.
>>> > > > > > >  There were projects like Speakup Modified (now dead I think), > > > > > >  but they
>>> > > > > > >  were community projects with no support from Fedora > > > > > >  developers.
>>> > > > > > >  Presumably, since Sonar is being folded in, they will use a > > > > > >  distro other
>>> > > > > > >  than Fedora. In the long term, I think Fedora would be a very > > > > > >  bad idea
>>> > > > > > >  for many reasons which I won't go into here.
>>> > > > > > > > > > > > >  I think it's a great idea for there to be an a11y, or even
>>> > > > > > >  blindness-specific nonprofit to be formed. I would even say > > > > > >  it's very
>>> > > > > > >  long overdue. If Apache, Mozilla, the Linux kernel and many > > > > > >  others can
>>> > > > > > >  do it, there is no reason why the blind community can't. I > > > > > >  would even
>>> > > > > > >  suggest moving this and other Linux lists to that > > > > > >  organization. Yes, I
>>> > > > > > >  realize that nonprofit and not-for-profit are different. I > > > > > >  would push to
>>> > > > > > >  make it a U.S based nonprofit. Start a Kickstarter or other > > > > > >  fundraising
>>> > > > > > >  compaign. I would donate to it. As much as Facebook doesn't > > > > > >  support
>>> > > > > > >  accessibility and generally is against the open source spirit, > > > > > >  a page on
>>> > > > > > >  there, Twitter, Tumblr, etc would be a very good idea. There > > > > > >  needs to be
>>> > > > > > >  a strong publicity team to write articles for both the > > > > > >  blindness
>>> > > > > > >  magazines (ACB Braille Forum, etc) and the mainstream Linux > > > > > >  magazines
>>> > > > > > >  like LWN. Amazingly, there has been almost no mention of > > > > > >  Speakup in the
>>> > > > > > >  mainstream Linux community at all. I think a fair number of > > > > > >  companies
>>> > > > > > >  and developers don't take us seriously because they don't know > > > > > >  we exist
>>> > > > > > >  and that blind people not only can and do use computers but in > > > > > >  fact can
>>> > > > > > >  and do use Linux on a regular basis. I just got an email from > > > > > >  someone
>>> > > > > > >  asking if I'm blind, how do I read and write? There is still a > > > > > >  huge
>>> > > > > > >  amount of ignorance out there. I realize this isn't strictly a > > > > > >  Linux
>>> > > > > > >  accessibility issue, but what leads to the next great > > > > > >  breakthrough might
>>> > > > > > >  be started by a developer seeing that blind people want an > > > > > >  accessible
>>> > > > > > >  desktop like everyone else. With an actual organization, KDE > > > > > >  could be
>>> > > > > > >  pushed for accessibility and developers from the organization > > > > > >  could
>>> > > > > > >  help. In other words, not only does it need to be a nonprofit > > > > > >  a11y
>>> > > > > > >  organization who works with other developers and develops > > > > > >  software, but
>>> > > > > > >  it also needs to be an advocacy and lobbyist group to demand > > > > > >  big and
>>> > > > > > >  small companies make their software accessible.
>>> > > > > > > > > > > > >  However, I see a huge flaw in the merger. I think we're going > > > > > >  down the
>>> > > > > > >  same path as Windows screen readers. I'm not saying that Vinux > > > > > >  would go
>>> > > > > > >  commercial. What I'm saying is I fear they would end up like a > > > > > >  big
>>> > > > > > >  company who shall remain nameless. There are other screen > > > > > >  readers out
>>> > > > > > >  there such as NVDA, but very few people take them seriously > > > > > >  because this
>>> > > > > > >  big company has almost a monopoly. Granted, Linux is still far > > > > > >  from
>>> > > > > > >  having a huge share of the market, but if it should reach the > > > > > >  90% or
>>> > > > > > >  even 50% point some day, it would be very unfortunate for > > > > > >  rehab agencies
>>> > > > > > >  and employers to force people to use Vinux because that's the > > > > > >  only
>>> > > > > > >  specialized distro for the blind. What would be much better is > > > > > >  to work
>>> > > > > > >  with the mainstream distros like Debian and Ubuntu to fix > > > > > >  accessibility
>>> > > > > > >  problems. Ubuntu is the most popular distro on the desktop. > > > > > >  While
>>> > > > > > >  accessibility is good, it has problems. When 16.04 came out, > > > > > >  Orca was
>>> > > > > > >  broken. I believe there are only a small number (no more than > > > > > >  a few)
>>> > > > > > >  people on the accessibility team. Debian could also > > > > > >  desperately use
>>> > > > > > >  help. It would look much better for the blind community if an
>>> > > > > > >  organization donated their time and talents to auditing the > > > > > >  packages in
>>> > > > > > >  Debian and either fixing those with accessibility bugs which > > > > > >  could
>>> > > > > > >  easily be fixed or working with the upstream developers, > > > > > >  providing
>>> > > > > > >  patches and consulting with them to make their packages more > > > > > >  accessible.
>>> > > > > > >  To me, it seems like a huge waste of time to put a ton of > > > > > >  energy into
>>> > > > > > >  beating Fedora, Ubuntu or whatever distro into submission and > > > > > >  slapping a
>>> > > > > > >  "Vinux" or "Sonar" label on it when that same upstream distro > > > > > >  with very
>>> > > > > > >  few tweaks could be made that way out of the box. If you > > > > > >  absolutely must
>>> > > > > > >  modify packages, desktop settings, etc from the upstream > > > > > >  defaults, such
>>> > > > > > >  as for low vision users, create a Vinux repository instead or > > > > > >  work with
>>> > > > > > >  the Ubuntu community to create an official Ubuntu flavor > > > > > >  called Ubuntu
>>> > > > > > >  VI or something. There is already a Ubuntu MATE flavor, so why > > > > > >  not work
>>> > > > > > >  with them directly? While we're at it, what about Orca? I see > > > > > >  only one
>>> > > > > > >  main paid developer working on it. I'm sure she could use some > > > > > >  help, not
>>> > > > > > >  to mention thorough testing. Getting back to the Windows > > > > > >  screen readers,
>>> > > > > > >  I fear that blind people will not be given the choice of what > > > > > >  distro
>>> > > > > > >  they want and will be locked out of mainstream use because > > > > > >  there is
>>> > > > > > >  primarily one Vinux to rule them all.
>>> > > > > > > > > > > > >  In conclusion, I will continue not recommending any > > > > > >  specialized distro
>>> > > > > > >  to my clients and other people. I think they are almost always > > > > > >  a
>>> > > > > > >  mistake. As we have seen yet again, it does lead to > > > > > >  fragmentation and
>>> > > > > > >  generally bad luck for all concerned. I couldn't get any of > > > > > >  them (Sonar,
>>> > > > > > >  Vinux or Talking Arch) to work reliably on my 2009 machine > > > > > >  which runs XP
>>> > > > > > >  great and has a very old, well-supported standard sound card. > > > > > >  I had to
>>> > > > > > >  invent my own live / rescue CD because there wasn't anything > > > > > >  reliable.
>>> > > > > > >  Hopefully the official Debian rescue CD will have reliable > > > > > >  speech soon.
>>> > > > > > >  Something like a Vinux rescue CD would be a great idea, but > > > > > >  not a live
>>> > > > > > >  system with an unreliable graphical desktop, horrible speech > > > > > >  (ESpeak)
>>> > > > > > >  and an unreliable infrastructure which crashes for no obvious > > > > > >  reason
>>> > > > > > >  while the mainstream Debian and Ubuntu distros don't. All of > > > > > >  that said,
>>> > > > > > >  I wish both teams the best of luck and I guess we'll see what > > > > > >  happens. I
>>> > > > > > >  would only add that if you haven't taken the plunge and > > > > > >  actually tried
>>> > > > > > >  Linux, give Ubuntu MATE a try. It's fast, works well and can > > > > > >  be
>>> > > > > > >  installed independently by the blind in about an hour. It > > > > > >  does,
>>> > > > > > >  unfortunately, still use ESpeak. Getting a commercial company > > > > > >  to release
>>> > > > > > >  a decent synth as open source would be a great thing for a > > > > > >  nonprofit to
>>> > > > > > >  do, even if it required buying the rights.
>>> > > > > > > > > > > > >  _______________________________________________
>>> > > > > > >  Blinux-list mailing list
>>> > > > > > >  Blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx
>>> > > > > > >  https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list
>>> > > > > > > > > > >  _______________________________________________
>>> > > > > >  Blinux-list mailing list
>>> > > > > >  Blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx
>>> > > > > >  https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list
>>> > > > > > > > > > > > >  _______________________________________________
>>> > > > >  Blinux-list mailing list
>>> > > > >  Blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx
>>> > > > >  https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list
>>> > > > > > > > > >  _______________________________________________
>>> > > >  Blinux-list mailing list
>>> > > >  Blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx
>>> > > >  https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list
>>> > > > > > >  _______________________________________________
>>> > >  Blinux-list mailing list
>>> > >  Blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx
>>> > >  https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list
>>> >  _______________________________________________
>>> >  Blinux-list mailing list
>>> >  Blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx
>>> >  https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Blinux-list mailing list
>>> Blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx
>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list
> _______________________________________________
> Blinux-list mailing list
> Blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list


_______________________________________________
Blinux-list mailing list
Blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Speakup]     [Fedora]     [Linux Kernel]     [Yosemite News]     [Big List of Linux Books]