Re: new question for geoff, was quick unrtf question?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



OK, that's true, The Greater than and less than symbols could be used for indirection, although that didn't appear to be the case to me.

Sorry for intruding, but since the original command example wasn't included, you may want to include that in a repost.

On 12/10/2013 11:48 AM, Karen Lewellen wrote:
My goal here is an exact answer. i understand the example you mean, but
sometimes the characters do play a role.


On Tue, 10 Dec 2013, Christopher Chaltain wrote:

It doesn't look like the original command is included below, but
normally when you see an option included in pointy brackets (<>) that
means that's a place holder for some user provided data, like a file
name. You'd replace that with the file name or user data in question
without the pointy brackets.

For example, if you were going to edit your journal, you might see
someone suggest running the command

$ gedit <JournalFileName.txt>

so you might actually run the command

$ gedit DailyJournal.txt

where DailyJournal.txt is the actual name of your journal file.

On 12/10/2013 11:28 AM, Karen Lewellen wrote:
 smiles,
 I do not mind educating others at my typing expense.
   First, am i correct in guessing that the  less than and  greater than
 characters are not to be included?
 for example, and I am doing this off the top of my head, so it may not
 be perfect.
 xsltproc -o mylife.html -o daisyTransform.xsl My_Life.xml
 would be correct?
 Karen

 On Tue, 10 Dec 2013, Geoff Shang wrote:

>  On Tue, 10 Dec 2013, Karen Lewellen wrote:
> > >   We do have xsltproc here at shellworld.
> >   Equally there is a daisyTransform.xsl
> >   file with my bookshare materials in each book.
> >   when I run the line below though I am getting a shared object
missing
> >   error..but I may not be running it correctly.
> >   to spare the list an exchange off topic, may i write you
privately to
> >   troubleshoot?
> >  You *could*, but I would venture to add that this isn't really
>  off-topic, and taking it private would prevent it from showing up in
>  search results, which might help anyone else with this problem in
>  future.
> >  Geoff.
> >  _______________________________________________
>  Blinux-list mailing list
>  Blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx
>  https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list
> >
 _______________________________________________
 Blinux-list mailing list
 Blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx
 https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list

--
Christopher (CJ)
chaltain at Gmail

_______________________________________________
Blinux-list mailing list
Blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list



_______________________________________________
Blinux-list mailing list
Blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list

--
Christopher (CJ)
chaltain at Gmail

_______________________________________________
Blinux-list mailing list
Blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Speakup]     [Fedora]     [Linux Kernel]     [Yosemite News]     [Big List of Linux Books]