Where is it? ----- Original Message ----- From: "Angelo Sonnesso" <asonnesso@coastalnet.com> To: <blinux-list@redhat.com> Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 10:50 PM Subject: Re: The growing accessibility gap: was Ameritech.net > look at the gnome development project. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Jared" <stofflej@yahoo.com> > To: <blinux-list@redhat.com> > Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 10:04 PM > Subject: Re: The growing accessibility gap: was Ameritech.net > > > > If the command line is so grate write me or help write me a mass market > > application that cells to millions of coppies. You can't because you can't > > use the g u i interface in linux like you can in windows. So you will have > > to write in general smaller market programs if you wish to do that for a > > job. I on the other hand because I'm not thick headed can write G U I > > applications with vb or any number of other tools. As for your comment to > > Mr. Toneby what about the people who tryed to make linux a more user > > friendly opperaiting system generated a G U I so they generated code that > > turned to inaccessible garbige for you so they are just as mutch at fault > as > > sun. A large part of microsoft is that the windows 3.1 was not around for > a > > long enough time for standerds to devolipe. They may have been responcible > > for the inaccessibility in the past but now they are making an effort to > > change that tell me is there anyone trying in the linux community cort or > no > > cort trying to make a screen reader for the G U I part of linux? If so > > please send me email so I can try and help but don't complain about > > microsoft when people arn't working to help your beloved oh so accessible > > linux. > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Jude DaShiell" <jdashiel@shellworld.net> > > To: <blinux-list@redhat.com> > > Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 9:35 PM > > Subject: Re: The growing accessibility gap: was Ameritech.net > > > > > > > The command line interface does not cause me any problems, it's that > other > > > junk that makes life hell. So far as bitching is concerned, you haven't > > > yet heard me bitch. All I did was to state some widely known and > accepted > > > axioms which are axiomatic since they're so easily proven. Were you > > > correct in your statements, the Council Of Agencies Serving the blind > > > would not have contemplated taking Microsoft to court in January of > 1995. > > > As it was, certain agreements were reached that seemingly alleviated the > > > necessity for litigation. > > > > > > Jude <jdashiel@shellworld.net> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > > Blinux-list@redhat.com > > > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list > > > > > > _________________________________________________________ > > Do You Yahoo!? > > Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > Blinux-list@redhat.com > > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Blinux-list@redhat.com > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com