On Fri, 1 Dec 2017, Johannes Berg wrote: > Hi Julia, > > On Fri, 2017-12-01 at 10:18 +0100, Julia Lawall wrote: > > > > The attribute metavariable declaration has become attribute name, to be > > more like eg declarer name, iterator name, etc. > > So we have to write > > attribute name __genl_const; > > right? Yes. > > The handling of attributes has also been extended so that you can actually > > match against them in some cases, such as on function declarations. On > > the oher hand, nothing was done to allow attributes in front of types that > > are alone. > > Very cool! > > > I can try to fix this. In the short term, perhaps using 1.0.4 is > > acceptable. > > To me that's OK, I'll try to keep it in mind. > > Can we do some "#ifdef" type syntax in spatch on the version of it? :-) There's nothing for that available at the moment. > I guess I could also have two different versions of the patch and write > some code to pick up which one to use, but that's a bit awkward ... > > But let me know if you can't actually fix this (easily), then I can do > that instead. OK, I'll try to look at it soon. julia -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe backports" in
