Re: Bumping required kernels to 3.0 for Linux backports ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 12:51 PM, Harrison Lee <harrisonl@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I do understand that dumping "ancient" kernel support would make things a lot easier.
> But, in the embedded system world, upgrading kernel isn't that easy like in PC world.
> Most of those systems put to market today has 2.6 kernels, and backports project is a great job and it will revive so many systems if it keeps the tradition to support down 2.6.24 as its predecessor.

Supporting bad ways to do embedded development is not a good thing,
which is why I had poked OpenWrt folks, which do *good* embedded
development, and wanted to ensure we support them. Models not
embracing a path to upgrade should seriously consider their
architecture.

  Luis
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe backports" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux