On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 4:07 PM, Matthew Jordan <mjordan at digium.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 3:05 PM, Alistair Cunningham > <acunningham at integrics.com> wrote: >> >> On 16/10/13 14:58, Matthew Jordan wrote: >>> >>> Is Paul's suggestion of using syslog or logstash (which can aggregate >>> logs from multiple sources) a valid work around? >> >> >> I'm not sure if this question is directed at me or the group in general? >> From my point of view, we already do our own logs, so logging through >> Asterisk is useful and makes debugging easier but is by no means essential - >> much less so than user events which allow us to interact with 3rd party >> software in ways that would be otherwise difficult. Perhaps Mark Michelson, >> who started this thread, would be the best person to ask. >> > > The question was certainly directed at the group :-) > > Right now Mark is scoping out what it would look like - but if there's a > collective 'meh' from the community, we can move on to more important > things. > +1 meh, couldn't have said it better! I do agree there is more important things :) -- Paul Belanger | PolyBeacon, Inc. Jabber: paul.belanger at polybeacon.com | IRC: pabelanger (Freenode) Github: https://github.com/pabelanger | Twitter: https://twitter.com/pabelanger
