Re: Firefox without signature checking

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Am 02.01.2016 um 22:52 schrieb Kyle Terrien:
It looks like that is only intended for release-status extensions. If I want to QA test a developer's beta build, this tells me that the developer would have to submit each build he wishes me to test to AMO. Why can't I just package the extension myself and load it? That is absurd. --Kyle Terrien

The official stance is that developers and testers should use the "Developer Version"[1] of Firefox. That release does not require extension signatures. [2] Jan Steffens (heftig) provides us with a compiled Arch Linux package in his repository. [3][4]

You can always provide or request an unofficial repository with binary packages of other firefox based projects.

1: https://www.mozilla.org/firefox/developer/
2: https://wiki.mozilla.org/Add-ons/Extension_Signing
3: https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=117157
4: http://pkgbuild.com/~heftig/repo/

--
Andreas Bosch


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux