>> This sounds like something for the AUR. I do not agree with this move from >> Mozilla and it would be interesting to see the interest in such a package. >> > > Agree - AUR. > > Arch should follow upstream - if there is a spin off alternative with this > disenagaged (HigherFox or whatever) ... we can certainly choose a different > package - but Arch should stick with the upstream version. > > Aside: > I don't use firefox - but curious - how would one test developer versions > of extensions then? Or is this no longer possible in firefox? There will be support for that of course https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/Add-ons/Distribution -- damjan
