On 01/02/2016 03:32 PM, Ben Oliver wrote:
On 2 January 2016 at 20:17, Kyle Terrien <kyleterrien@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
This sounds like something for the AUR. I do not agree with this move from
Mozilla and it would be interesting to see the interest in such a package.
Agree - AUR.
Arch should follow upstream - if there is a spin off alternative with
this disenagaged (HigherFox or whatever) ... we can certainly choose a
different package - but Arch should stick with the upstream version.
Aside:
I don't use firefox - but curious - how would one test developer
versions of extensions then? Or is this no longer possible in firefox?
