Re: Firefox without signature checking

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Sat, Jan 02, 2016 at 11:25:12PM +0100, Niels Kobschaetzki wrote:
> What about an AUR-package with a pre-compiled binary? Sure I have to
> trust the maintainer.

No, this is a recipe for spreading malware. Also, have you seen the size of
said binary?

> But I also have to with a source-package since I
> won't check the sources with each release ;)

Which is plain stupid.

Best,
-- 
Leonid Isaev
GPG fingerprints: DA92 034D B4A8 EC51 7EA6  20DF 9291 EE8A 043C B8C4
                  C0DF 20D0 C075 C3F1 E1BE  775A A7AE F6CB 164B 5A6D


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux