-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 01/29/2015 07:01 PM, Georg Altmann wrote: > On 29.01.2015 17:40, Don deJuan wrote: I am merely _suggesting_ to > implement a warning message. It certainly _is_ easy to miss > something in the "pacman -Suy" output. As such, I think this would > be beneficial to everybody running postgresql, be it on a single > desktop computer or a farm of servers. I'm silently following this discussion from the start and I completely agree with this POV. I'm myself a student and I'm sometimes (indirectly) asked to upgrade some servers, and I would have been completely desperate if I broke one because I forgot I was updating a piece of software which was breaking compatibility. This is why, in such case, companies are more willing to use stable distributions than Arch Linux. Thus, big +1 for more warnings in the future. Regards, - -- William Gathoye <william@xxxxxxxxxx> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJUzCvKAAoJEA595SwE1xaDBK4P/i2w+fUfk07PZaM5HmmxeX/u PqmGtytyQ22cE92/PLpoCgfa629zovPJubAFKzK3V9dRLsTcfN2KqCDUNdjIIlEB NmXhRXMq+Fpag/PtK3k4Hd2jUnVyKKjN+NjdYt5gTlhVOS6Sz/dtNh90SvblQyIY rGZrSJtf+qXY5462rvopDpyeItHHELauIY165LIa4YEJor6Cf5koiIOwb9lOi9wj xFY0B4l27gRBSLpUhRV0LkNa1lLor7PMQ2ARFMyYjle8bE0pGXMO51rURoX3ZUl/ TWpWHQ8Sb4FUYfq2aGwfkPn225/JylExZQjkgqBapKPseiLma09wXd6uK0m+l6q2 Xw70WUoXc0j+/9NUPf0DbY8W2pQTkhgbqieKvjLalnXp+/481+UvOPSMMIWOOkgf qGyWQVa2bWxBaYiAL9wNF2+fh6eeeZ6woZPxpRGW5STQe0SSIRTNqy1M9ce8xIq5 BHRo/tDR4/QPHRCxrHei4GnbpR3ggIggOvIeLv6RotmSQtCC4Of4PNdYS/rux/Ap kdM6yg6mkMQlmDey+KuSlW1C341gbvXccXb73a+d0p/SLn12HDZ6FxF5ciEoy2MY fQMTNbUJkMaMouNDnhV2iDQkxgsJtBmE+8t67sXSrq98jPsi+NW9jcCYLuko78aO hMRzwBdyeIT0vlu8bs7j =/x1g -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----